4.8 Article

Study on the shape control and photocatalytic activity of high-energy anatase titania

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 100, Issue 1-2, Pages 378-385

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.08.014

Keywords

Titania; Fluoride; Photocatalysis; Photoluminescence; High-energy facet

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20977114]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20090451086]
  3. Hubei Coal Conversion & New Carbon Materials Key Laboratory [2009WKDM01]
  4. South-Central University for Nationalities [YZCX100202Z]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present work, high-energy TiO2 photocatalysts with exposed {0 0 1} facets were tailored by hydrothermal reaction of tetrabutyl titanate (50 g) and HF solution at 200 degrees C for 24 h. The photocatalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The photocatalytic activity of the photocatalyst was evaluated by a photoluminescence technique using coumarin as a probe molecule. It shows that, with increase in the amount of HF, the shape of TiO2 evolves from octahedral bipyramid to nanosheet and the percentage of exposed high-energy {0 0 1} facets increases. The photocatalytic activity of the as-prepared high-energy anatase nanocrystals is positively related to the percentage of exposed {0 0 1} facets. When the amount of HF is more than 12 mL, the photocatalytic activity of anatase TiO2 nanosheets is high than that of P25. The high photocatalytic activity of the high-energy anatase TiO2 nanocrystals is ascribed to the synergetic effect of exposed high reactive {0 0 1} facets and surface fluorination. However, high concentrated HF (20 mL) results in the formation of cubic TiOF2, which shows very poor photocatalytic activity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available