4.6 Article

Human papillomaviruses of the mucosal type are present in some cases of extragenital Bowen's disease

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 152, Issue 6, Pages 1243-1247

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06643.x

Keywords

extragenital Bowen's disease; human papillomavirus; in situ hybridization; virus quantity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Bowen's disease in the genital area is generally considered to be caused by mucosal high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs). However, the detection rate and spectrum of HPVs in extragenital Bowen's disease are various and it is not clear to what extent HPV is involved in its pathogenesis. Objectives To assess the degree of association of HPV in extragenital cases by examining detection rates, types, quantities and localization of HPV. Methods A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach that we had previously established, which can give sensitive detection of a broad range of HPVs from cutaneous [including epidermodysplasia verruciformis-related HPVs (EV-HPVs)] to mucosal HPVs, was applied to samples from 41 patients with extragenital Bowen's disease and normal skin samples from 48 individuals. Semiquantitative L1-PCR and tyramide-based in situ hybridization (ISH) were also employed for positive cases. Results HPVs belonging to the mucosal high-risk group were detected in three patients with Bowen's disease (7%; two HPV 16 and one HPV 33), with 10(-1)-10(-3) copy equivalents per diploid amount of cellular DNA. They were distributed among most nuclei of tumour cells but in none of the cells of adjacent normal skin. HPVs belonging to the cutaneous group were detected in two patients (5%; HPV 27 and HPV 76) at 10(-2)-10(-3) copy equivalents, the same level as in a normal skin specimen positive for type 23 EV-HPV. No positive signals were observed by ISH. Conclusions HPVs belonging to the mucosal high-risk group may participate in the development of extragenital Bowen's disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available