4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Thermal decomposition of synthetic ammonium jarosite

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
Volume 744, Issue -, Pages 295-300

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2004.10.051

Keywords

ammonium jarosite; alpha-Fe2O3; Fe(OH)SO4; Fe2O(SO4)(2); Fe-2(SO4)(3); FT-IR; Mossbauer; electron microscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ammonium jarosite (NH4Fe3(OH)(6)(SO4)(2)) was produced by forced hydrolysis of a NH4Fe(SO4)(2) solution. Upon heating of ammonium jarosite at 400 degrees C, the IR band at 1426 cm(-1) corresponding to nu(N-H) vibrations almost disappeared, thus indicating decomposition of the NH4+ ion. The IR bands at 1197, 1081 and 1003 cm(-1) can be assigned to sulphate groups in ammonium jarosite. Upon heating of ammonium jarosite at 400 degrees C the IR bands showed positions at 1200, 1092 and 1011 cm(-1), with a shoulder at 1026 cm(-1). The FT-IR spectrum did not change by heating ammonium jarosite at 500 degrees C. Assignations of IR bands are given. The changes in the FT-IR spectra recorded for the samples produced up to 500 degrees C were not sufficient for the phase analysis of these samples. Fe-57 Mossbauer spectroscopy was very sensitive to the phase changes in the thermal decomposition products of ammonium jarosite. Upon heating of ammonium jarosite at 400 degrees C, the corresponding Mossbauer spectrum was deconvoluted into two doublets which were assigned to Fe(OH)SO4 and Fe2O(SO4)(2). The Mossbauer spectrum recorded for the sample produced by heating of ammonium jarosite at 500 degrees C, was deconvoluted into three doublets which were assigned to Fe-2(SO4)3, Fe(OH)SO4 and Fe2O(SO4)(2). Hematite (alpha-Fe2O3) was produced upon heating of ammonium jarosite at 600 degrees C, as found by Mossbauer and FT-IR spectroscopies. Quantitative data obtained by deconvolution of the Mossbauer spectra are summarized. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available