4.1 Review

Genetic association studies of complex traits: design and analysis issues

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.006

Keywords

association study; complex trait; genetics; genomics; single nucleotide polymorphism; review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Most common diseases and many important quantitative traits are complex genetic traits, with multiple genetic and environmental variables contributing to the observed phenotype. Because of the multi-factorial nature of complex traits, each individual genetic variant generally has only a modest effect, and the interaction of genetic variants with each other or with environmental factors can potentially be quite important in determining the observed phenotype. It remains largely unknown what sort of genetic variants explain inherited variation in complex traits, but recent evidence suggests that common genetic variants will explain at least some of the inherited variation in susceptibility to common disease. Genetic association studies, in which the allele or genotype frequencies at markers are determined in affected individuals and compared with those of controls (either population- or family-based), may be an effective approach to detecting the effects of common variants with modest effects. With the explosion in single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery and genotyping technologies, large-scale association studies have become feasible, and small-scale association studies have become plentiful. We review the different types of association studies and discuss issues that are important to consider when performing and interpreting association studies of complex genetic traits. Heritable and accurately measured phenotypes, carefully matched large samples, well-chosen genetic markers, and adequate standards in genotyping, analysis, and interpretation are all integral parts of a high-quality association study. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available