Journal
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 11, Pages 1900-1902Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.050
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
OBJECTIVES We sought to determine the usefulness of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements to differentiate constrictive pericardifis (CP) from restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCMP). BACKGROUND The differentiation of CP from RCMP may be clinically difficult and often requires hemodynamic assessment. No laboratory marker has been shown to differentiate the two conditions. METHODS We measured BNP levels in 11 patients suspected of having either CP or RCMP. All patients had hemodynamic assessment the day of BNP measurements. RESULTS Six patients had CP and five patients had RCMP based on established hemodynamic criteria. Both CP and RCMP patients had similar elevation in intracardiac pressures. Despite similar pressures, the mean plasma BNP levels were significantly higher in RCMP compared to CP (825.8 +/- 172.2 pg/ml vs. 128.0 +/- 52.7 pg/ml, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The BNP levels are significantly elevated in RCMP compared to CP patients; BNP may prove to be a useful noninvasive marker for the differentiation of the two conditions. (c) 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available