4.6 Article

Alternative splicing switches the divalent cation selectivity of TRPM3 channels

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 280, Issue 23, Pages 22540-22548

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M503092200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TRPM3 is a poorly understood member of the large family of transient receptor potential ( TRP) ion channels. Here we describe five novel splice variants of TRPM3, TRPM3a1-5. These variants are characterized by a previously unknown amino terminus of 61 residues. The differences between the five variants arise through splice events at three different sites. One of these splice sites might be located in the pore region of the channel as indicated by sequence alignment with other, better-characterized TRP channels. We selected two splice variants, TRPM3a1 and TRPM3a2, that differ only in this presumed pore region and analyzed their biophysical characteristics after heterologous expression in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. TRPM3a1 as well as TRPM3a2 induced a novel, outwardly rectifying cationic conductance that was tightly regulated by intracellular Mg2+. However, these two variants are highly different in their ionic selectivity. Whereas TRPM3a1 encoded channels are poorly permeable for divalent cations, TRPM3a2- encoded channels are well permeated by Ca2+ and Mg2+. Additionally, we found that currents through TRPM3a2 are blocked by extracellular monovalent cations, whereas currents through TRPM3a1 are not. These differences unambiguously show that TRPM3 proteins constitute a pore-forming channel subunit and localize the position of the ion-conducting pore within the TRPM3 protein. Although the ionic selectivity of ion channels has traditionally been regarded as rather constant for a given channel-encoding gene, our results show that alternative splicing can be a mechanism to produce channels with very different selectivity profiles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available