4.0 Article

Reduced loss of hand bone density with prednisolone in early rheumatoid arthritis - Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 165, Issue 11, Pages 1293-1297

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.11.1293

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis presents as osteoporosis and joint erosions. Prednisolone has been shown to reduce the rate of hand joint destruction as seen on radiography but has not been shown to reduce the rate of hand bone loss. Methods: In a double-blind study comparing oral prednisolone (7.5 mg/d for 2 years) with placebo, hand bone density assessed with digital x-ray radiogrammetry was examined in 95 patients with rheumatoid arthritis with disease duration of less than 2 years. Results: The mean loss of hand bone density was less in prednisolone-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients at the 1-year follow-up (-0.011 vs -0.022 g/cm(2)) (P=.005) and at the 2-year follow-up (-0.026 vs -0.039 g/cm(2)) (P=.03). The mean percent-age group difference in loss of hand bone density was 2.8% (P=.004) at the 1-year follow-up and 3.5% (P=.01) at the 2-year follow-up. In the first year, C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation, was strongly correlated with hand bone loss in placebo-treated patients but not in prednisolone-treated patients, suggesting that prednisolone breaks the link between bone loss and inflammation. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first double-blind randomized study to show that disease-related loss of hand bone density in rheumatoid arthritis can be decelerated by prednisolone. This finding suggests that the deleterious effect of prednisolone on bone may be counteracted by its anti-inflammatory effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available