4.5 Article

Sensitivity of silicon isotopes to whole-ocean changes in the silica cycle

Journal

MARINE GEOLOGY
Volume 217, Issue 3-4, Pages 267-282

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.11.016

Keywords

silicon; delta Si-30; long-term silica cycle; 2-box model; diatom; silicon isotopes

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C510583/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A 2-box model has been used to assess the impact of both long- and short-term budgetary imbalance in the silica cycle on the average silicon isotopic composition (630 Si) of the ocean and marine sediments. Over a 100-ky time span, such as a Quaternary glacial cycle, a sustained change in the riverine flux of silicon to the oceans could alter the average delta(30)Si of seawater and the average delta(30)Si of opal outputs by a few hundredths to a few tenths of permil. This would be largely tied to a change in the delta(30)Si of silicon entering the ocean due to a shift in the proportion of riverine and non-riverine sources of silicon. A doubling of the riverine flux of silicon would have little impact on average marine 630 Si, but a sustained halving of river inputs could interfere with use of delta(30)Si as a tracer of nutrient utilization. Studies on the longer term focussed on the transition from a high silicic acid to low silicic acid ocean associated with the rise of the diatoms. This transition is marked by drop in the average delta(30)Si of seawater from greater than +1.9 parts per thousand down to about +0.8 parts per thousand. The isotopic composition of diatom opal, however, has an isotopic composition that sticks close to the +0.8 parts per thousand of the inputs and is thus unlikely to provide information about the transition to the low silicic acid ocean of the modem day. However, the delta(30)Si of opal produced in the deep sea (for example, by sponges) should document this transition. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available