4.7 Article

Polysomy 17 in HER-2/neu status elaboration in breast cancer: Effect on daily practice

Journal

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages 4393-4399

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2256

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To assess the effect of chromosome 17 copy number on HER-2/neu status determination in breast cancers. Experimental Design: HER-2/neu gene copy and chromosome 17 centromere numbers were evaluated on 893 breast carcinomas using double color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The net and chromosome 17 corrected (ratio) HER-2/neu copy numbers were compared and related to immunohistochemistry done according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - approved scoring system (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+) as a first screening step in 584 cases. Results: When a ratio >= 2 was considered as criterion for FISH positivity, 49.3% (440 of 893) of cases showed amplification versus 56.2% (502 of 893) by using a net HER-2/neu gene copy number > 4 as a alternative criterion; 14.8% (67 of 453) of cases having a ratio < 2 had a net HER-2/neu gene copy number > 4 and 1.1% (5 of 440) with a ratio >= 2 had a net HER-2/neu gene copy number < 4. Among discordant cases, 88.8% (64 of 72) were polysomic (> 2.25 chromosomes 17/cell) and among polysomic cases, 12.8% (40 of 312) of the low polysomic (2.26-3.75 chromosomes 17/cell) and 36.9% (24 of 65) of the highly polysomic (> 3.75 chromosomes 17/cell) cases showed discordance. In cases with a ratio < 2, polysomy 17 incidences were 85.7% (6 of 7) in IHC 3+, 42.4% (79 of 186) in IHC 2+, 33.3% (15 of 45) in IHC 1+, and 29.1% (16 of 55) in IHC 0. Conclusion: A net increase in HER-2/neu gene copy number consecutive to polysomy 17 in the absence of specific gene amplification might lead to a strong protein overexpression in a small subset of breast carcinomas. HER-2/neu status determination by FISH is dependent on the criterion considered for positivity in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available