4.7 Article

Fear potentiation and fear inhibition in a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 57, Issue 12, Pages 1559-1564

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.025

Keywords

startle reaction; fear; classical conditioning; electromyography; inhibition; conditional discrimination

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [1R24MH067314-01A1, R37 MH47840, 1F32 MH070129-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The inability to suppress excessive fear or anxiety is a significant clinical problem. In the laboratory, extinction is a preferred method for the study of fear inhibition: however, in this paradigm the same stimulus causes both elicitation (excitation) and inhibition of fear, making it difficult to know whether an experimental manipulation that affects extinction does so by affecting one or both of these processes. For this reason, we sought to develop a behavioral procedure in humans that would render a stimulus primarily inhibitory. Methods: We adapted a conditional discrimination procedure (AX+/BX-), previously validated in animals, to a human fear-potentiated startle paradigm. Forty-one healthy volunteers were presented with one set of colored lights paired with the delivery of aversive airblasts to the throat (AX+) and a different series of light,,; Presented without airblasts (BX-). Results. Participants exhibited fear potentiation to AX+, discrimination between AX+ and BX-, and transfer of fear inhibition to A in an AB compound test but not in an AC compound test. Conclusions: We believe this procedure will advance Clinical research on fear disorders, such as posttraumatic stress disorder and phobias, by providing an effective and relatively independent measure of fear potentiation and fear inhibition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available