4.8 Article

Discrepancy between TPD- and FTIR-based measurements of Bronsted and Lewis acidity for sulfated zirconia

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 84, Issue 3-4, Pages 591-597

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.05.025

Keywords

Sulfated zirconia; TPD; Isopropylamine; Pyridine; DRIFTS

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CTS: 0223008, CBET: 0651058, 0243832]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Chemistry [0243832] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Office Of The Director
  5. EPSCoR [0814442] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Temperature-programmed desorptions (TPD) of isopropylamine (IPA), NH3, and pyridine were compared with diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) of pyridine to determine the effect of H2O on the Bronsted and Lewis acidities of two sulfated zirconia (SZ) catalysts. Although the traditional interpretation of pyridine infrared spectra showed an apparent increase in Bronsted acidity upon treating SZ with H2O, TPD spectra showed that H2O displaced IPA from approximately one-fifth of the Lewis sites with no corresponding increase in Bronsted acidity. Water treatment prior to TPD displaced similar amounts of both NH3 and pyridine. The primary effect of H2O is displacement of weakly adsorbed basic probe molecules from Lewis sites, rather than the conversion of Lewis sites to Bronsted sites. Finally, different types of analyses (e.g. infrared or TPD) of catalyst acidity yield dramatically different conclusions regarding Bronsted and Lewis acidity. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available