4.7 Article

Production of fumonisin B and C analogues by several Fusarium species

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 53, Issue 12, Pages 4861-4866

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf050307n

Keywords

Fusarium; fumonisins; tandem mass spectrometry; DNA; amplified fragment length polymorphisms

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Six strains of Fusarium vetficillloides, two of F. oxysporum, one strain of F. proliferatum, and a strain of an unidentified species were cultured on maize patties and rice and evaluated for their ability to simultaneously produce fumonisin B (FB) and C (FC) series analogues. Fumonisins were quantified by LC-MS-MS using positive ion electrospray ionization. FC, provided characteristic fragment ions at m/z 690, 672, 654, 532, 514, and 338 corresponding to sequential loss of H2O and tricarboxylic acid moieties from the alkyl backbone, while FC3 and FC4 provided equivalent product ions 16 and 32 amu lower than the corresponding FC, fragments, respectively. All isolates cultured on maize produced FC4. All isolates except for that of F proliferatum also produced FC1, and three of the six strains of F verticllioides produced FC3. All isolates except those of F oxysporum produced detectable amounts of FB1, FB2, and FB3. Isolates that produced fumonisin B analogues produced at least 10 fold more of the B series analogues than they did of the C series analogues. The results confirm that at least some strains of F. oxysporum produce FC, but not FB, fumonisin analogues and also suggest that the genetics and physiological regulation of fumonisin production may be more complicated than previously envisaged since some strains of F. verticillioides and F. proliferatum as well as the strain of the unidentified species can simultaneously produce both FB and FC analogues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available