4.6 Article

The functional heterogeneity of type 1 effector T cells in response to infection is related to the potential for IFN-γ production

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 12, Pages 7732-7739

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7732

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI0465530, AI55154, AI45666, AI61587] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [ML63925] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The expression of IFN-gamma is a hallmark of Th1 cells and CD8(+) effector T cells and is the signature cytokine of type 1 responses. However, it is not known whether T cells are homogeneous in their capacity to produce IFN-gamma, whether this potential varies between tissues, and how it relates to the production of other effector molecules. In the present study we used bicistronic IFNy-enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (IFN-gamma-eYFP) reporter mice (Yeti) and MHC class I tetramers to directly quantify IFN-gamma expression at the single cell level. The eYFP fluorescence of Th1 cells and CD8(+) effector T cells was broadly heterogeneous even before cell division and correlated with both the abundance of IFN-gamma transcripts and the secretion of IFN-gamma upon stimulation. CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells of influenza-infected mice revealed a similarly heterogeneous IFN-gamma expression, and eYFP(high) cells were only found in the infected lung. Ag-specific T cells were in all examined tissues eYFP(+), but also heterogeneous in their reporter fluorescence, and eYFP(high) cells were also restricted to the infected lung. A similar heterogeneity was observed in Toxoplasma gondii-infected animals, but eYFP(high) cells were restricted to different tissues. Highly eYFP fluorescent cells produced elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines in addition to IFN-gamma, suggesting their coregulated expression as a functional unit in highly differentiated effector T cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available