4.6 Article

Enhanced catalytic performances of Ni/Al2O3 catalyst via addition of V2O3 for CO methanation

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 488, Issue -, Pages 37-47

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.09.028

Keywords

Ni/Al2O3 catalyst; Vanadium oxide; Ni3V2O8; CO methanation; CO2 methanation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21476238]
  2. National Basic Research Program [2014CB744306]
  3. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2010BAC66B01]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA07010100, XDA07010200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly active and coking resistant Ni-V2O3/Al2O3 catalysts were prepared by co-impregnation method for CO and CO2 methanation. The influence of vanadium oxide addition on catalyst structure, distribution and reducibility of Ni species, morphology and surface characteristics, was investigated in detail. Compared to the catalyst without vanadium, the Ni-V2O3/Al2O3 catalysts showed significant improvement in the activity, thermal stability, and resistance to coke formation in CO methanation. In addition, these catalysts also showed high activities for CO2 methanation at both atmospheric and 2.0 MPa pressures. It was found that Ni3V2O8 was formed during the calcination of the Ni-V2O3/Al2O3 catalysts, which led to the formation of smaller Ni particle sizes (ca. 3.0 nm) as compared to the case without vanadium oxide addition. The higher catalytic activity over the Ni-V2O3/Al2O3 catalysts for CO methanation was mainly due to the larger H-2 uptake, the higher Ni dispersion as well as the smaller metallic Ni nanoparticles. The oxidation-reduction cycle of V2O3 could increase the oxygen vacancies, which enhanced the dissociation of CO2 by-product and generated surface oxygen intermediates, thus preventing carbon deposition on the Ni particles in CO methanation. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available