4.6 Article

Discrimination of irrigated and rainfed rice in a tropical agricultural system using SPOT VEGETATION NDVI and rainfall data

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages 2527-2547

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431160500104335

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classification of irrigated crops by remote sensing requires the use of time series data, since the timing, cropping intensity and duration of cropping is quite variable over the course of a year. Rice is the dominant irrigated crop in tropical and sub-tropical Asia, where rainfall is high, but is seasonal and often uni-modal. Existing crop classification methods for rice are not able to distinguish between rainfed and irrigated crops, leading to errors in classification and estimated irrigated area. This paper describes a technique, a 'peak detector algorithm', to successfully discriminate between rainfed and irrigated rice crops in Suphanburi province, Thailand. The methodology uses a three-year time series of Satellite pour l'Observation de la Terre (SPOT) VEGETATION S10 Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data (10 day composites) to identify cropping intensity (number, timing and peak values). Peak NDVI is then lagcorrelated with long term average rainfall data. There is a high correlation at a 40-50 day lag, between a peak rainfall and a 'single' peak NDVI of rainfed rice. In irrigated areas, there are multiple peaks, and multiple correlations with low values for at least 90 days after peak rainfall. The methodology currently uses a mask to remove un-cropped and non-rice areas, which is derived from existing Geographical Information Systems (GIS). The method achieves a classification accuracy of 89% or better against independent groundtruth data. The procedure is designed as a second level of analysis to refine classifications using other techniques of mapping irrigated area at global and regional scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available