4.7 Article

Adult-type soft tissue sarcomas in pediatric-age patients: Experience at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori in Milan

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages 4021-4030

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.053

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors for which optimal treatment remains controversial. We report on a large group of 182 patients younger than 18 years old treated at a single institution over a 25-year period. Patients and Methods In this relatively homogeneous subgroup of adult-type histotypes, surgery was the mainstay of treatment; radiotherapy was administered to 73 patients, and chemotherapy was administered to 114 patients (70 received chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy). Results Overall survival at 5 years was 89 % in patients who underwent complete resection at diagnosis, 79 % in patients who had marginal resection, 52 % in initially unresected patients, and 17 % in patients with metastases at onset. Outcome was unsatisfactory in patients with large and high-grade tumors, even after gross resection; adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to improve the results in this group. Initially unresected patients who responded well to chemotherapy and subsequently underwent complete resection had an event-free survival rate of approximately 70 %. The rate of response to chemotherapy was 58 %. Conclusion The identification of prognostic variables should enable risk-adapted therapies to be planned. Patients with initially unresectable disease and patients with resected large and high-grade tumors are at high risk of metastases and treatment failure. Although the limits of this retrospective analysis are self-evident, our data would suggest that intensive chemotherapy (with an ifosfamide-doxorubicin regimen) might have a more significant role in these patients than what is generally assumed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available