4.7 Article

Nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of survivin in 67 surgically resected pancreatic cancer patients

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages 2225-2232

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602632

Keywords

pancreatic carcinoma; surviving; Cox-2; prognosis; apoptosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive gastrointestinal cancer with less than 10% long-term survivors. The apoptotic pathway deregulation is a postulated mechanism of carcinogenesis of this tumour. The present study investigated the prognostic role of apoptosis and apoptosis-involved proteins in a series of surgically resected pancreatic cancer patients. All patients affected by pancreatic adenocarcinoma and treated with surgical resection from 1988 to 2003 were considered for the study. Patients' clinical data and pathological tumour features were recorded. Survivin and Cox-2 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. Apoptotic cells were identified using the TUNEL method. Tumour specimen of 67 resected patients was included in the study. By univariate analysis, survival was influenced by Survivin overexpression. The nuclear Survivin overexpression was associated with better prognosis ( P = 0.0009), while its cytoplasmic overexpression resulted a negative prognostic factor ( P = 0.0127). Also, the apoptotic index was a statistically significant prognostic factor in a univariate model ( P = 0.0142). By a multivariate Cox regression analysis, both the nuclear ( P = 0.002) and cytoplasmic ( P = 0.040) Survivin overexpression maintained the prognostic statistical value. This is the first study reporting a statistical significant prognostic relevance of nuclear and cytoplasmic Survivin overexpression in pancreatic cancer. In particular, patients with high nuclear Survivin staining showed a longer survival, whereas patients with high cytoplasmic Survivin staining had a shorter overall survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available