4.6 Article

Ordered mesoporous tungsten carbide nanoplates as non-Pt catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 477, Issue -, Pages 102-108

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.02.034

Keywords

Mesoporous; Tungsten carbide; Palladium; Oxygen reduction reaction; Electrochemical properties

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korean Government [NRF-2012M1A2A2671689]
  2. International Collaborative Energy Technology R&D Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [2138520030800]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M1A2A2671689] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We represent well-defined mesoporous tungsten carbide catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction in alkaline solution. The pore structures of tungsten carbide nanoplates (WC-700-m, WC-800-m and WC-900-m) are formed as a function of reaction temperature of 700, 800 and 900 C in CH4((25%)/H-2(75%) atmosphere for 9 h using layered tungsten nitride nanoparticles. All the tungsten carbide nanoplates exhibit isothermal sorption characteristics of mesoporous structure and fairly monomodal pore size distribution in the range of 6.6-7.2 nm. The WC-700-m, WC-800-m, and WC-900-m exhibit X-ray diffraction patterns corresponding to WCi-x, WCi-x +WC, and WC phase, respectively. In particular, the WC-900-m shows highly improved electrocatalytic activity toward oxygen reduction reaction in an alkaline solution as compared to the WC-900-c. Furthermore, the WC-900-m supported Pd catalyst as a non-Pt exhibits much enhanced electrochemical oxygen reduction properties in comparison with conventional Pt catalyst. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available