4.6 Article

Effect of the size and distribution of supported Ru nanoparticles on their activity in ammonia synthesis under mild reaction conditions

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 474, Issue -, Pages 194-202

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2013.09.039

Keywords

Low-temperature ammonia synthesis; Ru supported catalyst; Nanoparticle; Size distribution; Catalytic cooperation

Funding

  1. Belgium National Fund for Scientific Research (FSR-FNRS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ru/gamma-Al2O3 catalysts were prepared using three different methods: wet impregnation, colloidal method and microemulsion. Ru-supported nanoparticles with different average sizes and distribution of sizes were obtained. The catalysts were tested in ammonia synthesis under mild reaction conditions, namely low temperature (100 degrees C) and low pressure (4 bar), and characterized by N-2 adsorption, XRD, XPS, TEM and TPR techniques. The results indicate that a good catalytic performance can be achieved by Ru supported nanoparticles fulfilling two requirements: (i) a relatively high average size (despite the usual assertion that only small particles are required) and (ii) a broad distribution of sizes that ensures the presence of both small particles, containing highly active sites, and large nanoparticles, which are shown to promote the reaction on small particles. This promotion results from a cooperative effect between small and large nanoparticles in good contact, which also allows keeping a highly reduced surface of ruthenium. It is proposed that, under mild reaction conditions, large Ru nanoparticles promote the ammonia synthesis reaction by allowing a more effective activation and transfer of hydrogen atoms, able to hydrogenate strongly adsorbed nitrogen atoms, and thus to release active sites for the activation of N2. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available