Journal
AQUACULTURE
Volume 247, Issue 1-4, Pages 253-266Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.024
Keywords
Cyprinus carpio; common carp; microsatellites; population genetics
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In the past, the genetics of common carp populations has mainly been studied on regional levels using traditional protein markers. We analysed four microsatellite loci of 577 individuals from 22 domesticated, wild and feral populations spanning a geographical area as wide as from Europe through Central Asia to East and South-East Asia. The variability of these loci was much higher than that of the allozyme loci examined in our previous studies. A total number of 143 alleles were recorded across loci ranging from 27 at MFW28 to 47 at MFW7. However, the mean number of alleles per locus was remarkably lower: from 2.50 in a captive stock of River Amur wild carp to 14.25 in a wild population from Lake Amasaiskie, Uzbekistan, and domesticated Chinese carp from Wuhan. The variability of populations did not show a clear geographical pattern but a highly significant difference was found in allelic richness between the 13 domesticated/ captive stocks (average A(r) = 4.436) and the nine wild-caught populations (average A(r) = 8.221). The prevalence of different alleles in different populations resulted in a high degree of population differentiation: the F-ST values for all but four pairwise comparisons of Central Asian wild populations were significant. Within geographical regions the D-A distances between populations were smallest in Central Asia (average D-A = 0.139), intermediate in Europe (average D-A = 0.434) and largest in East/South-East Asia (average D-A = 0.833). Between geographical regions the European and Central Asian populations showed the smallest distances (average D-A = 0.484) whereas the distances of these two regions and East/South-East Asia were almost identical but substantially larger (Europe vs. East/South-East Asia: average D-A = 0.801, and Central Asia vs. East/South-East Asia: average D-A = 0.806). All populations clustered into only two highly divergent major groups with 91% bootstrap support: Europe/Central Asia and East/South-East Asia. Thus, the microsatellite data also suggest an ancient separation of European/Central Asian from East/South-East Asian carp and a single origin of European carp in Central Asia as already inferred from our previous allozyme and mtDNA RFLP studies. The taxonomic status of subspecies assigned to European (C c. carpio) and East Asian carp (C c. haematopterus) is supported. However, because of their close relationship to European carp the Central Asian carp do not deserve a separate subspecies status (C c. aralensis). (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available