4.6 Article

Ubiquitous aluminum alkyls and alkoxides as effective catalysts for glucose to HMF conversion in ionic liquids

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 435, Issue -, Pages 78-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2012.05.035

Keywords

Biomass; Glucose; Ionic liquids; HMF; Aluminum catalysts

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy-Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-10ER16193]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal halides (chlorides in particular) are employed almost exclusively as Lewis acid catalysts for the homogeneous conversion of glucose (or cellulose) to HMF (5-hydroxymethylfurfural) in ionic liquids (Its), with CrCl2 being arguably the most effective benchmark catalyst. Reported herein is a discovery that ubiquitous aluminum alkyl or alkoxy compounds are very effective Lewis acid catalysts for the glucose-to-HMF conversion in ILs. Under the current reaction conditions (1-ethy1-3-methylimidazolium chloride [EMIM]Cl, 120 degrees C, 6 h), simple trialkyl and trialkoxy aluminum species such as AlEt3 and Al((OPr)-Pr-i)3, which are much cheaper than CrCl2 (by a factor of 5 for AlEt3 or 180 for Al((OPr)-Pr-i)(3)). are at least as effective as CrCl2 to catalyze this conversion process. The molecular structure of [EMIM](+)[ClAlMe(BHT)2](-), formed upon mixing the alkylaryloxy aluminum MeAl(BHT)(2) and the IL [EMIM]Cl, has been determined by X-ray diffraction: the structure simulates that of the metallate [EMIM](+)[CrCl3](-), the proposed active species responsible for the effective glucose to HMF conversion by CrCl2 in [EMIM]Cl. Another significant finding is that a gradual substitution of the chloride ligand on aluminum by the alkyl ligand brings about a drastic enhancement on the HMF yield, from 1.6% by AlCl3 to 7.6% by MeAlCl2 to 17% by Et2AlCl and to 51% by AlEt3, thus showing approximately an overall 32-fold HMF yield enhancement going from AlCl3 to AlEt3. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available