4.7 Article

Impact of radical versus non-radical pathway in the Fenton chemistry on the iron redox cycle in clouds

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 718-724

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.052

Keywords

multiphase chemical modeling; Fenton reaction; OH radical; ferryl ion; iron redox cycling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modeling studies have shown that the Fenton reaction of iron(II) with H2O2 can contribute, in a significant amount, to OH radicals production in cloud droplets. However, the destruction mechanism of hydrogen peroxide by iron(II) is still uncertain. Two reaction pathways for the first step of Fenton chemistry have been advanced: a radical pathway which considers an OH radical production and a non-radical pathway considering ferryl ion production. The aim of this work is to evaluate the impact of these two possible reaction pathways for Fenton chemistry on the iron redox cycle in cloud droplets. For this purpose, the numerical model of multiphase chemistry M2C2 has been applied to a rural chemical scenario representative of continental conditions. This study highlights that the iron redox cycling is driven by Fenton reaction whatever Fenton mechanism is considered. The ferryl ion chemistry becomes significant in the iron redox cycling when this species is considered as an active intermediate in Fenton chemistry and under night time conditions the iron redox chemistry is controlled by the ferryl ion reactivity. The partitioning of iron between its two main oxidation states (+II and +III) in cloud droplets, which is the indicator of the iron oxido-reduction potential, does not change significantly between the two cases. However, for the non-radical case, the ferry] ion concentration is up to four orders of magnitude higher than the OH concentration highlighting its potential role in oxidative capacity of cloud droplets. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available