4.6 Article

Influence of the chemical activation of carbon nanofibers on their use as catalyst support

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 393, Issue 1-2, Pages 78-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.11.027

Keywords

Chemical activation; Carbon nanofibers; Nickel; Butyronitrile hydrogenation

Funding

  1. Consejeria de Ciencia y Tecnologia de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha [PCI08-0020-1239]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three nickel catalysts supported on carbon nanofibers (CNFs) have been prepared by deposition-precipitation (ca. 3%, w/w). The CNFs were prepared by catalytic chemical vapour decomposition of ethylene over a Ni/SiO2 catalyst, and chemically activated with RbOH (CNFRbOH) and KOH (CNFKOH). The materials were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), N-2 adsorption-desorption, temperature-programmed oxidation. X-ray diffraction (XRD), acid-base titrations and temperature-programmed decomposition in helium. KOH was the most effective activating agent, developing carbon porosity, decreasing the crystalline character and increasing surface acidity to a higher extent. After nickel introduction, the catalysts were characterized by temperature-programmed reduction, XRD, TEM, N-2 adsorption-desorption and acid-base titrations. Surface-area weighted mean Ni particle diameters (post reduction at 400 degrees C) followed the sequence: Ni/CNFKOH (4.9 nm) < Ni/CNFKbOH (8.6 nm)< Ni/CNF (25.5 nm), where a further activation of the support led to smaller/better dispersed nickel particles. The surface acidity of the catalysts followed the sequence: Ni/CNFRbOH < Ni/CNF < Ni/CNFKOH. The gas phase hydrogenation of butyronitrile was used as a surface characterization test, where bigger nickel particles consistently developed higher catalytic activity. Selectivity, however, was not sensitive to metal particle size, but increased towards condensation products with increasing catalyst acidity. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available