4.6 Article

High catalytic activity and selectivity for hydroxylation of benzene to phenol over multi-walled carbon nanotubes supported Fe3O4 catalyst

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 375, Issue 2, Pages 265-271

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.008

Keywords

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes; Fe3O4; Defects; Hydroxylation of benzene; Phenol

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20673056]
  2. Environmental Protecting Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [2007016]
  3. Open Analysis Foundation of Nanjing University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes supported Fe3O4 catalysts (Fe/MWCNTs) were prepared for catalyzing the hydroxylation of benzene in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. The iron species in Fe/MWCNTs is Fe3O4 due to the spontaneous reduction of partial Fe3+ on the defect sites of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), which is different from the Fe2O3 in the active carbon supported iron (Fe/AC) and graphitic carbon supported iron (Fe/GC) catalysts prepared by the same procedure. The benzene conversion was enhanced by 3.5 and 5.4 times, and the selectivity to phenol was increased by 2.1 and 1.5 times over Fe/MWCNTs catalyst in reference to the latter two carbon-based catalysts. The high catalytic activity for Fe/MWCNTs catalyst mainly comes from the more efficient catalytic component of Fe3O4 and the beneficial topology of MWCNTs. The high selectivity to phenol should arise from the consumption of the excessive hydroxyl radicals by MWCNTs, hereby preventing the further oxidation of phenol. The catalytic performance of Fe/MWCNTs is also superior to other carbon-free support-based iron catalysts, such as Fe/gamma-Al2O3, Fe/MCM-41, Fe/HY and Fe/HZSM-5. These results indicate the potential application of Fe/MWCNTs catalyst in the hydroxylation of benzene to phenol. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available