4.7 Article

Intraoperative functional MRI: Implementation and preliminary experience

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 685-693

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.022

Keywords

electrical peripheral nerve stimulation; functional magnetic resonance imaging; intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For a non-invasive identification of eloquent brain areas in neurosurgical procedures up to now only preoperative functional brain mapping techniques are available. These are based, e.g., on preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations in awake patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility to perform fMRI during neurosurgical procedures in anesthetized patients. For that purpose, a passive stimulation paradigm with peripheral nerve stimulation was applied. A 1.5-T MR scanner placed in a radiofrequency-shielded operating room with an adapted operating table was used for intraoperative fMRI. The fMRI data were analyzed during acquisition by an online statistical evaluation package installed on the MR scanner console. In addition, phase reversal of somatosensory evoked potentials was used for verification of intraoperative fMRI. In four anesthetized patients with lesions in the vicinity of the central region a total of 11 fMRI measurements were successfully acquired and analyzed online. Activation was found in the somatosensory cortex, which could be confirmed by intraoperative phase reversal for each measurement. Furthermore, statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was employed for an extensive offline data analysis. We did not observe any neurological deterioration or complications due to the stimulation technique. Intraoperative fMRI is technically feasible allowing a real-time identification of eloquent brain areas despite brain shift. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available