4.6 Article

Influence of Pr and Ce in dry methane reforming catalysts produced from La1-xAxNiO3-δ perovskites

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 369, Issue 1-2, Pages 97-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.09.004

Keywords

CH4 dry reforming; Ni perovskites; Pr, Ce cation substitution; Coke inhibition; Auto-combustion method

Funding

  1. ECOS - NORD
  2. University of Antioquia [1115-06-17639]
  3. University of Antioquia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

La(1-x)A(x)NiO(3-delta) (A = Pr, Ce) perovskites were synthesized by the auto-combustion method and evaluated as catalyst precursors in the dry reforming of methane. After reduction of the perovskites the average diameter of Ni degrees on the catalysts LaNiO3, La0.9Ce0.1NiO3 and La0.9Pr0.1NiO3-delta were: 15 nm, 9 nm and 6 nm, respectively. Catalysts obtained by the reduction of the perovskites had the highest catalytic activity under drastic reaction conditions (10 mg of catalyst and a mixture of CH4/CO2 without dilution gas) compared to unreduced catalysts. The highest catalytic activity was obtained with the catalyst which was produced from the La0.9Pr0.1NiO3-delta perovskite. CH4 and CO2 conversions and the H-2/CO molar ratio were 49%, 55% and 0.81, respectively. No carbon deposits were detected after 100 h of reaction. The high resistance to deactivation is related to the lower Ni degrees particle size as well as to the redox chemistry of praseodymium oxide Pr2O3, which may become re-oxidized by CO2 during the reforming reaction to produce PrO2 and CO. Subsequently, the PrO2 may react with carbon residues regenerating again the reduced Pr2O3 oxide and gasifying the carbon deposits. A trend to decrease the amount of carbon deposits with increasing the Ce or Pr doping level was observed. The catalysts were characterized by TPR, TGA, TEM, ICP-AES and in situ XRD. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available