4.5 Article

Selected genetic polymorphisms in MGMT, XRCC1, XPD, and XRCC3 and risk of head and neck cancer:: A pooled analysis

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages 1747-1753

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0162

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tobacco and alcohol consumption are the major risk factors for head and neck cancer, likely due to DNA-damaging processes. Genetic variations in DNA repair genes may affect an individual's susceptibility to head and neck cancer. Pooling data and DNA specimens from three case-control studies in western Washington State, North Carolina, and Puerto Rico, totaling 555 cases (430 whites) and 792 controls (695 whites), we studied the risk of head and neck cancer in relation to common nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms in four DNA repair genes: MGMT (Leu(84)Phe and Ile(143)Val), XRCC1 (Arg(399)Gln), XPD (Lys(751)Gln), and XRCC3 (Thr(241)Met). All single-nucleotide polymorphisms were assayed in a single laboratory. Among whites, carriage of the MGMT Phe84 [odds ratio (OR), 0.71; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.51-0.98] or Val(143) (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.92) allele was associated with a decreased risk of head and neck cancer; the haplotype distribution for MGMT differed significantly between cases and controls (covariate-adjusted global permutation test, P = 0.012). The XRCC1 GlnGln(399) genotype was also associated with decreased risk among whites (OR, 0.56; 95% Cl, 0.32-0.94), whereas XPD751 and XRCC3(241) were not associated with risk. Alcohol-related risks tended to vary with DNA repair genotypes, especially for MGMT variants, whereas no effect modification was noted with tobacco use. Consistent findings from three case-control studies suggest that selected DNA repair enzymes may play a role in head and neck carcinogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available