4.6 Article

Effect of Rh content on carbon-supported PtRh catalysts for dehydrogenative electrooxidation of cyclohexane to benzene over polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 352, Issue 1-2, Pages 145-151

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.10.014

Keywords

PtRh catalysts; Cyclohexane oxidation; Fuel cells; Cyclic hydrocarbons; Benzene

Funding

  1. New & Renewable Energy RD program [2005-N-FC03-P-01-0-000]
  2. Korea Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy (MOCIE),
  3. Korea Research Foundation
  4. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF2007-313-DO0148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical dehydrogenative oxidation of cyclohexane to benzene was studied over carbon-supported PtRh (PtRh/C) electrocatalysts, which were prepared with different Pt:Rh atomic ratios from 4:1 to 1:4 using a borohydride reduction method combined with freeze-drying procedure at room temperature. The bimetallic PtRh/C catalysts were characterized by various physicochemical analyses such as X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-ray absorption-near-edge spectroscopy (XANES). The variation of Rh content over the PtRh alloy formation caused significant structural and electronic modifications on the catalyst phase, which could be associated with consistent changes in electrocatalytic activities over a polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell. The Pt4Rh1/C catalyst as the anode electrocatalyst showed a maximum power density of ca. 8.5 MW cm(-2). Here, both the structural modification via lattice parameter change and the electronic modification through charge transfer from Rh to Pt could kinetically facilitate the sluggish electrode reaction with an increased exchange current density on the dehydrogenative electrooxidation of cyclohexane to benzene over the PtRh/C anodes of cyclohexane fuel cell. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available