4.6 Article

Intestinal responsiveness to experimental colitis in young rats is altered by maternal diet

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00459.2004

Keywords

maternal diet; lipids; suckling pups; inflammatory bowel disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing evidence suggests that fetal and neonatal nutrition impacts later health. Aims of the present study were to determine the effect of maternal dietary fat composition on intestinal phospholipid fatty acids and responsiveness to experimental colitis in suckling rat pups. Female rats were fed isocaloric diets varying only in fat composition throughout gestation and lactation. The oils used were high (8%) in n-3 [ canola oil ( 18: 3n-3)], n-6 (72%) [ safflower oil ( 18: 2n-6)], or n-9 (78%) [ high oleic acid safflower oil ( 18: 1n-9)] fatty acids, n = 6/group. Colitis was induced on postnatal day 15 by intrarectal 2,4-dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid ( DNBS) administration with vehicle (50% ethanol) and procedure (0.9% saline) controls. Jejunal and colonic phospholipids and milk fatty acids were determined. The distal colon was assessed for macroscopic damage, histology, and MPO activity. The 18: 2n-6 maternal diet increased n-6 fatty acids, whereas the 18: 3n-3 diet increased n-3 fatty acids in milk and pup jejunal and colonic phospholipids. Maternal diet, milk, and pup intestinal n-6-to-n-3 fatty acid ratios increased significantly in order: high 18: 3n-3 < high 18: 1n-9 < high 18: 2n-6. DNBS administration in pups in the high 18: 2n-6 group led to severe colitis with higher colonic damage scores and MPO activity than in the 18: 1n-9 and 18: 3n-3 groups. High maternal dietary 18: 3n-3 intake was associated with colonic damage scores and MPO activity, which were not significantly different from ethanol controls. We demonstrate that maternal dietary fat influences the composition of intestinal lipids and responsiveness to experimental colitis in nursing offspring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available