4.6 Article

Titanium and cerium-containing mesoporous silicate materials as catalysts for oxidative cleavage of cyclohexene with H2O2:: A comparative study of catalytic activity and stability

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 345, Issue 2, Pages 195-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2008.04.039

Keywords

cyclohexene; oxidation; hydrogen peroxide; adipic acid; titanium; cerium; mesoporous silicate materials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Catalytic properties of transition-metal-containing silicate materials with hexagonally packed mesopore-channels, Ti-MMM-2 and Ce-SBA-15, have been studied in oxidative cleavage of cyclohexene (CyH) to adipic acid using aqueous H2O2 as oxidant. In a solvent-free system, the yield of adipic acid reached 10-15% at H2O2/CyH 3.6 mol mol(-1) and 80 degrees C after 72 h. The stepwise addition of the oxidant to the reaction mixture allowed increasing the yield of the target product up to 33 and 18% for Ti-MMM-2 and Ce-SBA-15, respectively. For both catalysts, the yield of adipic acid decreased significantly in the second run despite CyH conversion attained 100%. The catalyst stability and the reasons of the deactivation have been explored. For both catalytic materials, partial decrease of the mesopore surface area and mesopore volume was observed after the CyH oxidation run. DRS-UV-vis study revealed irreversible formation of oligomerized TiO2-like species on the Ti-MMM-2 surface due to interaction of Ti centres with the oxidant and the reaction products. The elemental analysis data showed that adipic acid causes leaching of titanium from Ti-MMM-2 into solution. Ce-SBA-15 was found to be more stable with respect to the active metal leaching but prone to deactivation due to agglomeration of cerium ions to form cerium oxide nanocrystallites; partial reduction of Ce(IV) to Ce(III) also occurred. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available