4.4 Article

Validation of the timeline follow-back in the assessment of adolescent smoking

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 33-43

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.12.007

Keywords

timeline follow-back; adolescents; smokers; assessment

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1 R01 CA80255-02, 1R01 CA84719-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [2R01 DA11204] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The timeline follow-back instrument (TLFB) is a valid and reliable method of quantifying alcohol use patterns. The use of this instrument has been expanded to assess other behaviors, such as drug use, sexual behavior, binge eating, and panic attacks. Some evidence for the validity and reliability of this assessment instrument has emerged in the area of adult smoking. However, to date, there is no published evidence of its reliability and validity in the assessment of adolescent smoking. The purpose of this study is to present early evidence of the utility of the TLFB to collect information on adolescent smoking behavior. Through secondary data analysis of four studies on adolescent smokers, we examined the associations between the TLFB and measures of dependence, smoking history, respiratory symptoms, and saliva cotinine. Moreover, we examined the stability of the TLFB data across two 15-day time periods. Results provide preliminary evidence of the validity and reliability of the TLFB in the assessment of adolescent smoking. In particular, the TLFB instrument offered important data on the heterogeneity of adolescent smoking patterns beyond a global measure of cigarettes per day, and the reduction of digit bias. Implications of these findings for the assessment of adolescent smoking are discussed. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available