4.7 Article

Comparison of ABP1 over-expressing Arabidopsis and under-expressing tobacco with an auxinic herbicide-resistant wild mustard (Brassica kaber) biotype

Journal

PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 169, Issue 1, Pages 21-28

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.02.010

Keywords

Arabidopsis; auxin-binding protein; auxinic herbicides; cell elongation; lateral roots; tobacco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An auxinic herbicide-resistant biotype of wild mustard was discovered in western Canada in a field sprayed once each year for ten years with combinations of 2,4-D, MCPA and dicamba. Earlier research suggests that the resistance may be due to altered binding of auxinic herbicides to an auxin-binding protein (ABP) in wild mustard. To further elucidate the role of ABP in inducing auxinic herbicide responses in wild mustard. a series of in vitro experiments were initiated. A protocol for generating cell suspensions of both auxinic herbicide-resistant (R) and -susceptible (S) wild mustard was developed from callus cultures. Auxinic herbicide-induced physiological responses (e.g. cell elongation or lateral root formation) of R and S biotypes were compared with ABP1 antisense tobacco (NASI), as well as to ABP1 over-expressing Arabidopsis in cell suspension and seed culture experiments, respectively. Upon treatment with either NAA (synthetic auxin) or picloram (auxinic herbicide), there was an increased cell elongation in the S biotype and wild-type tobacco, whereas there was no cell elongation in cell suspensions of the R biotype and NAS1. A dose-response assay measuring picloram-induced lateral root formation in the in vitro seed cultures of wild mustard and Arabidopsis showed excessive lateral root formation in the S biotype (0.5-10 mu M) and ABP1 over-expressing Arabidopsis (1 mu M). These results correlate with the differences between ABP (a potential auxin receptor) levels in R and S wild mustard and this difference may be a possible mechanism of resistance to auxinic herbicides. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available