4.4 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Genome Shuffling Enhances Lipase Production of Thermophilic Geobacillus sp (Retracted article. See vol. 183, pg. 1539, 2017)

Journal

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 4, Pages 1444-1454

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-014-1109-6

Keywords

Genome shuffling; Lipase; Strain improvement; Thermophilic bacteria; Geobacillus sp.

Funding

  1. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT), Thailand
  2. Centre of Excellence on Environmental Health and Toxicology, Science AMP
  3. Technology Postgraduate Education and Research Development Office (PERDO), Ministry of Education [ETM-R-05-003/2554]
  4. Kasetsart University
  5. Higher Education Research Promotion
  6. National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermostable lipases are potential enzymes for biocatalytic application. In this study, the lipase production of Geobacillus sp. CF03 (WT) was improved by genome shuffling. After two rounds of genome shuffling, one fusant strain (FB1) achieved increase lipase activity from the populations generated by ultraviolet irradiation and ethyl methylsulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis. The growth rate and lipase production of FB1 increased highest by 150 and 238 %, respectively, in comparison to the wild type. The fusant enzyme had a significant change in substrate specificity but still prefers the long-chain length substrates. It had an optimum activity at 60 A degrees C, pH at 7.0-8.0, with p-nitrophenyl palmitate (C16) as a substrate and retained about 50 % of their activity after 15 min at 70 A degrees C, pH 8.0. Furthermore, the fusant lipase showed the preference of sesame oil, waste palm oil, and canola oil. Therefore, the genome shuffling strategy has been successful to strain improvement and selecting strain with multiple desirable characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available