4.7 Article

Long-term calcium supplementation does not affect the irons status of 12-14-y-old girls

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 98-102

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/82.1.98

Keywords

iron status; intervention; calcium supplementation; calcium intake; adolescence; puberty; girls

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Single-meal studies have established that calcium has an acute inhibitory effect on the absorption of iron. However, there is growing evidence that high calcium intakes do not compromise iron status. Objective: We evaluated whether long-term calcium supplementation taken with the main meal affected biomarkers of iron status in adolescent girls with high requirements of both iron and calcium. Design: The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of supplementation with 500 mg Ca/d for 1 y among 113 adolescent girls aged 13.2 +/- 0.4 y at enrollment. Participants were advised to take the supplement with their evening meal, which usually contributes the majority of dietary iron. Iron status was assessed at baseline and after 1 y of supplementation by measuring hemoglobin and serum concentrations of ferritin and transferrin receptors (TfRs). Results: The mean (+/- SD) hemoglobin at enrollment was 134 +/- 9 g/L, geometric mean serum ferritin was 26.3 mu g/L (interquartile range: 18.6-39.4 mu g/L), and serum TfR was 4.19 mg/L (3.52-5.10 mg/L). Daily calcium supplementation had no effect on the least-squares mean concentrations of iron-status markers adjusted for their baseline values (hemoglobin: 136 and 134 g/L, P = 0.31; ferritin: 25.4 and 26.1 mu g/L, P = 0.73; TfR: 4.1 and 4.4 mg/L, P = 0.12; and the ratio of TfR to ferritin: 160 and 161 in the calcium and placebo groups, respectively; P = 0.97). Conclusion: Although it remains to be shown in iron-deficient persons, long-term iron status does not seem to be compromised by high calcium intakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available