4.2 Article

Benidipine improves oxidized LDL-dependent monocyte and endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 551-557

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001863

Keywords

procoagulant markers; anti-oxLDL antibody; type 2 diabetes mellitus; hypertension; benidipine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effects of long-term benidipine treatment on levels of monocyte and endothelial cell activation markers in hypertensive patients with ( n = 28) and without ( n = 10) type 2 diabetes mellitus. Benidipine, 4 mg/day, was administered for 6 months; there were no other changes in any of the patients pharmacologic regimens during benidipine treatment. Clinical and biochemical data obtained before and after benidipine administration were compared; all markers were measured by ELISA. The levels of platelet activation markers (CD62P, CD63, and PAC-1), microparticles (monocyte-derived microparticles: MDMPs, and endothelial cell-derived microparticles: EDMPs), chemokines ( monocyte chemotactic peptide 1: MCP-1, regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted: RANTES) and soluble adhesion markers ( soluble E-selectin and soluble ICAM-1) differed in the control and hypertension groups. In addition, levels of platelet, monocyte, and endothelial cell activation markers, microparticles, chemokines, and soluble adhesion molecules were higher in hypertensive patients than in those without type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, benidipine administration decreased the concentrations of all these markers. The effect of this drug was significant in diabetes patients with high levels of antioxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) antibody. These results suggest that benidipine is effective for the treatment of oxLDL-dependent vascular disorders in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available