4.6 Article

Heterologous late-domain sequences have various abilities to promote budding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 14, Pages 9038-9045

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.14.9038-9045.2005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01CO12400, N01-CO-12400] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retroviral late (L) domains present within Gag act in conjunction with cellular proteins to efficiently release virions from the surface of the cell. Three different critical core sequences have been identified as required elements for L-domain function: PPPY, PTAP (also PSAP), and YPDL, with different retroviruses utilizing one or two of these core sequences. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) L domain is centered around a PTAP sequence in the p6 region of Gag. To assess the ability of heterologous L-domain sequences to be functionally interchanged for those in full-length HIV-1, we produced a series of constructs that replaced PTAP-containing p6(Gag) sequences with those of PPPY- or YPDL-based L domains. While previous studies had found that L domains are interchangeable in other retroviruses, most of the sequences introduced into p6(Gag) failed to substitute for PTAP-mediated L-domain function. One exception was the 11-amino-acid p2b sequence of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) Gag, which could fully restore HIV-1 budding, while a PPPPY sequence exchange alone did not. This suggests that the RSV L domain consists of more than simply its core L-domain sequence. The HIV-p2b chimera was as infectious as the wild type, produced normal virions, and was sensitive to proteasome inhibitors. These results show that L-domain sequences are not necessarily interchangeable. Thus, HIV-1 Gag might have a more stringent requirement for L-domain function than the other retroviruses previously studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available