4.6 Article

Recurrent infarction causes the most deaths following myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 118, Issue 7, Pages 752-758

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.02.010

Keywords

autopsy; mode of death; cause of death; myocardial infarction; heart failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: The development of left ventricular systolic dysfunction or heart failure following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a powerful marker of an adverse prognosis. Recurrent MI could be an important cause of death, either directly or by provoking arrhythmias. METHODS: The OPTIMAAL trial randomized 5477 patients with heart failure or evidence of left ventricular dysfunction following acute MI to losartan or captopril. Over a follow-up of 2.7 years, there were 946 deaths. Of the 180 (19%) of these deaths for which autopsy reports were available, acute MI was found in 57% (102 of 180) of the autopsies. By comparison, an endpoints adjudication committee using clinical data attributed death to acute MI in only 29 cases. An acute MI was found at autopsy in 55% (37 of 67) of the deaths that had been classified as due to an arrhythmia and in 81% (21 of 26) of the deaths classified as due to progressive heart failure. Including autopsy diagnoses, the rate of acute MI in patients who died suddenly was independent of the time elapsed since the index MI, but in patients not classified as dying suddenly, there was a time-related decrease in recurrent MI from 78% in the first 30 days to 30% by the end of follow-up. However, only 19% of patients who died underwent autopsy, so recurrent MI may have been substantially more common and perhaps had a different relation to time since the index MI if more patients had undergone autopsy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with evidence of major cardiac dysfunction after MI, recurrent MI found at autopsy is common and has often not been clinically detected. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available