4.7 Article

Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: A prospective controlled comparison of ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen and letrozole for embryo cryopreservation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 19, Pages 4347-4353

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.037

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To develop safe ovarian stimulation methods to perform in vitro fertilization (IVF) in breast cancer patients who wish to preserve their fertility via embryo cryopreservation before chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Sixty women (age range, 24 to 43 years) with breast cancer were prospectively studied. Twenty-nine patients underwent 33 ovarian stimulation cycles with either tamoxifen 60 mg/d alone (Tam-IVF) or in combination with low-dose follicle-stimulating hormone (TamFSH-IVF) or letrozole 5 mg in combination with FSH (Letrozole-IVF). After IVF, all resultant embryos were cryopreserved to preserve fertility. Recurrence rates were compared with controls (n = 31) who elected not to undergo IVF. Results Compared with Tam-IVF, both TamFSH-IVF and Letrozole-IVF patients had greater numbers of follicles (2 +/- 0.3 v 6 +/- 1 and 7.8 +/- 0.9, respectively; P < .0001), mature oocytes (1.5 +/- 0.3 v 5.1 +/- 1.1 and 8.5 +/- 1.6, respectively; P < .001), and embryos (1.3 +/- 0.2 v 3.8 +/- 0.8 and 5.3 +/- 0.8, respectively; P < .001). Peak estradiol (E,) levels were lower with Letrozole-IVF and Tam-IVF compared with TamFSH-IVF. After 554 31 days (range, 153 to 1,441 days) of follow-up, cancer recurrence rate was similar between lVF and control patients (three of 29 v three of 31 patients, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.29 to 7.4), and this estimate was not affected by cancer stage. Conclusion The combination of low-dose FSH with tamoxifen (TamFSH-IVF) or letrozole (Letrozole-IVF) results in higher embryo yield compared with Tam-IVF. Recurrence rates do not seem to be increased, but the letrozole protocol may be preferred because it results in lower peak E-2 levels. (c) 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available