4.4 Article

Validity of a VO2max prediction equation of the 2-km walk test in female seniors

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 453-456

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-821157

Keywords

walking; elderly; aerobic fitness test; limits of agreement; VO2max

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Walking is a useful exercise mode for most adults due to its general ease, acceptability, and safety. Therefore, many field tests based on performance in walking have been developed to predict VO2max. Even if these tests are much easier to perform than laboratory tests, field tests have to be valid. The objective of the paper was to explore the accuracy and bias of a VO2max prediction equation of the 2-km Walk Test, in an active female senior group (n = 18, mean age: 66.1 +/- 4.4). VO2max (1 - min(-1)) was measured during cycle ergometry by direct gas analysis from a maximal test (step: 30 W, time: 2 min 30). VO(2)ma,, related to body mass was then calculated (ml - min(-1) - kg(-1)). Subjects completed also the 2-km Walk Test (UKK Institute). VO2max(ml(.)min(-1.)kg(-1)) was then predicted from age, sex, body mass index, heart rate, and walking time measured during the 2-km Walk Test. Predicted VO2max and measured VO2max were highly correlated (r=0.63, p < 0.01). Predicted VO2max (20.5 +/- 6.1ml(.)min(-1.)kg(-1)) was not significantly different from measured V02max (18.7 3.4ml-min(-1.)kg(-1)). Prediction equation bias with its 95% limits of agreement was - 1.8 +/- 4.8 ml (.) min(-1) (.) kg(-1) with a coefficient of variation of 24.2%. In an active female senior population, the 2-km Walk Test offers a fairly accurate VO2max prediction. The training and learning effects can be neglected because when the test was repeated no significant bias was observed between the two trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available