4.7 Article

Cytotoxic minor histocompatibility antigen HA-1-specific CD8+ effector memory T cells:: artificial APCs pave the way for clinical application by potent primary in vitro induction

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 144-149

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2940

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) for treatment of relapsed leukemia after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is hindered by the laborious and time-consuming procedure of generating dendritic cells for antigen presentation. Artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPCs) offer the advantage of being readily available in sufficient numbers, thus allowing for a highly standardized in vitro induction of CTLs. We generated aAPCs coated with anti-CD28 antibody (Ab) and either high-density (HD) or low-density (LD) major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules loaded with HA-1(H), a nonapeptide derived from the hematopolesis-restricted minor histocompatibility antigen HA-1. HD- and LD-aAPCs potently induced HA-1(H)-Specific CD8(+) CTLs from untouched CD8(+) T cells of healthy donors. CTLs were subsequently purified by magnetic-activated cell sorting. HD- as well as LD-aAPC-induced CTLs exerted high HA-1(H)-Specific cytotoxicity, resembled T(c)1 effector memory cells, survived a long time in vitro, and were expanded by a factor varying between 8.2 x 10(4) and 51 X 10(4). The T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of HA-H-1 tetramer-positive CTLs was oligoclonal with a prominent usage of V beta 6. The TCR repertoire of tetramer-positive CTLs was distinct from and more restricted than that of tetramer-negative cells. These findings indicate that aAPCs are attractive tools for the ex vivo generation of HA-1(H)-specific CTLs suitable for immunotherapy of relapsed leukemia. (c) 2005 by The American Society of Hematology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available