4.4 Article

Evaluation of High Solids Alkaline Pretreatment of Rice Straw

Journal

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 162, Issue 6, Pages 1768-1784

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-010-8958-4

Keywords

Lime; Calcium hydroxide; Sodium hydroxide; Alkaline pretreatment; Biomass; Rice straw; Delignification; Enzymatic hydrolysis

Funding

  1. Chevron Technology Ventures (Houston, Texas, USA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fresh-harvested, air-dried rice straw was pretreated at a water content of 5 g H(2)O/g straw using sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and compared to pretreatment at 10 g H(2)O/g straw by hydrated lime (Ca(OH)(2)). Full factorial experiments including parallel wash-only treatments were completed with both sources of alkali. The experiments were designed to measure the effects of alkaline loading and pretreatment time on delignification and sugar yield upon enzymatic hydrolysis. Reaction temperature was held constant at 95A degrees C for lime pretreatment and 55A degrees C for NaOH pretreatment. The range of delignification was 13.1% to 27.0% for lime pretreatments and was 8.6% to 23.1% for NaOH pretreatments. Both alkaline loading and reaction time had significant positive effects (p < 0.001) on delignification under the design conditions, but only alkaline loading had a significant positive effect on enzymatic hydrolysis. Treatment at higher temperature also improved delignification; delignification with water alone ranged from 9.9% to 14.5% for pretreatment at 95A degrees C, but there was little effect observed at 55A degrees C. Post-pretreatment washing of biomass was not necessary for subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis. Maximum glucose yields were 176.3 mg/g dried biomass (48.5% conversion efficiency of total glucose) in lime-pretreated and unwashed biomass and were 142.3 mg/g dried biomass (39.2% conversion efficiency of total glucose) in NaOH-pretreated and unwashed biomass.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available