4.0 Article

Evaluation of software-based telephone Counseling to enhance medication persistency among patients with multiple sclerosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 466-472

Publisher

AMER PHARMACEUTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1331/1544345054475469

Keywords

multiple sclerosis; interferon beta-1a; Avonex; Transtheoretical Model of Change; motivational interviewing; medication persistence; adherence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a software-supported intervention based on the Transtheoretical Model of Change and motivational interviewing on decreasing discontinuation ( or increasing persistency) of Avonex ( interferon beta-1a-Biogen), a medication for treatment of multiple sclerosis ( MS). Design: Randomized controlled experimental design comparison of software-based telephone counseling ( intervention group) and standard care ( control group). Setting: United States. Participants: 366 patients with MS. Intervention: Software-based telephone counseling. Main Outcome Measure: Discontinuation of Avonex treatment and movement among stages of the Transtheoretical Model of Change. Results: Patients in the software intervention group demonstrated a statistically significantly lower proportion of Avonex treatment (1.2%) discontinuation than the standard care group (8.7%). In addition, stage movement away from discontinuation of Avonex (i.e., toward continuation of therapy) was significantly higher in the treatment group. Conclusion: The Transtheoretical Model of Change constructs and motivational interviewing processes were effectively incorporated into a software-based intervention program, and this significantly decreased the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment of MS with Avonex. The integration of behavioral theory with information systems offers a promising approach for pharmacists and other providers to promote medication persistency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available