4.7 Article

Association between hyper- and hypoglycaemia and 2 year all-cause mortality risk in diabetic patients with acute coronary events

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages 1255-1261

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi230

Keywords

diabetes mellitus; prognosis; unstable angina pectoris; non-Q-wave myocardial infarction; hyperglycaemia; hypoglycaemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The study evaluated the associations between glycometabolic parameters at admission and during hospitalization and 2 year all-cause mortality risk in an unselected cohort of consecutive patients with diabetes admitted for unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction to a university hospital during 1988-98. Methods and results A total of 713 consecutive patients with diabetes were included. During 2 years of follow-up, 242 (34%) patients died. All. analyses were retrospective using prospectively collected clinical data. The primary study endpoint was 2 year all-cause mortality collected from the Swedish cause-specific mortality register. In unadjusted analyses, high admission blood glucose (highest vs. lowest quartile: hazard ratio (HR) 2.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.83, 3.86) and hypoglycaemia recorded during hospitalization (hypoglycaemia vs. normal: HR 1.77; 95% Cl 1.09, 2.86) were both significantly associated with increased 2 year all.-cause mortality risk. These associations remained significant after muttivariabie adjustment. Conclusion In the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) among patients with diabetes, hyperglycaemia on arrival and hypoglycaemia during hospitalization are both independently associated with worse adjusted all-cause 2 year mortality risk. These observations suggest that the avoidance of both hyper- and hypoglycaemia during ACS events may be of similar importance, and glucose modulation remains an important objective to address in future randomized trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available