4.5 Article

Effect of pore structure on proton conductivity and water uptake in nanoporous TiO2

Journal

JOURNAL OF POROUS MATERIALS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 201-214

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10934-005-1649-9

Keywords

nanoparticles; nanoporosity; water content; TiO2; proton conductivity; density of water; xerogels; DTA; TG; impedance spectroscopy; BET; pH; water structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports on an investigation involving water content, water properties and proton conductivity in nanoporous TiO2 materials fabricated through sol-gel processing techniques. TiO2 nanoparticles having a primary particle diameter of less than 5 nm are packed into xerogels at room temperature and at 50 degrees C. The resulting xerogels are fired at temperatures of 200, 300 and 400 degrees C to alter the structural properties of these materials. Further alteration in the surface chemistry of the pore walls of these materials are made by equilibrating these porous wafers at pH 1.5 and 4.0 using nitric acid. Porosity, pore size, and surface area are evaluated with nitrogen adsorption techniques. Water content is calculated using data from thermogravimetric methods and water adsorption isotherms. Proton conductivity is measured using impedance spectroscopy. Of all variables affecting water content, water structure, and proton conductivity, the pH of pre-equilibrating the fired xerogels is the most important. However, porous structures of TiO2 arising from the open packing of nanoparticles, that have less tortuosity, are substantially different in the uptake of water with relative humidity than samples obtained from the close-packing of these same particles regardless of firing temperature. Also, the material with the smallest pore size (a close-packed structure fired at 200 degrees C) has the highest proton conductivity when measured between 20-60% relative humidity making this system the most favorable in terms of proton exchange membrane systems. Lastly, it is interesting to note that the density of water in these pores can vary between 1.2 and 1.6 g/l which is different than the 1.0 g/l of bulk water. This result likely comes from a combination of surface charge and surface roughness that affects the structure of interfacial water. These findings have importance not only for proton exchange membrane systems but also for other membrane technologies, cements, sensors, fabrication of wetting surfaces and in other areas that might benefit from the use of nanoporous materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available