4.7 Article

Effects of storage temperatures and annealing conditions on the structure and properties of potato (Solanum tuberosum) starch

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.02.008

Keywords

potatoes starch; amylose; gelatinisation temperatures; annealing condition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Starches were extracted from freshly harvested potatoes (12 cultivars, grown in Perthshire) and the properties of the starches of six cultivars; were compared with starches extracted from the same samples but stored at 5, 25 or 55 degrees C for 7 days before extraction. The amylose (total) content of the freshly extracted starches from tubers stored at 5, 25 or 55 degrees C was on average 27.9 +/- 2.3, 28.3 +/- 1.7, 29.2 +/- 2.2 and 28.8 +/- 1.5%, respectively, with corresponding phosphorus representing 60 +/- 16, 64 +/- 9, 61 +/- 5 and 63 +/- 9 mg 100 g(-1). The unit chain distribution by chromatography of the amylopectin molecules from the starches extracted from the different conditions was very similar with an average degree of polymerisation (DP) of 26 +/- 2 where the two major fractions (F1 and F2) represented 54 2 and 19 1, respectively. Peak gelatinisation temperatures (T-p) and enthalpies (Delta H) for the freshly extracted starches and from tubers stored at 5 or 25 degrees C were very similar (63.3 +/- 1.5 degrees C and 18.6 +/- 0.8 J g(-1); 63.1 +/- 1.0 degrees C and 17.7 +/- 1.5 J g(-1) and; 62.9 +/- 0.7 degrees C and 18.7 +/- 1.1 J g(-1), respectively) although starches stored at 55 degrees C were annealed, where T-p represented 7 1.1 +/- 1.1 degrees C and Delta H 18.1 +/- 1.4 J g(-1). These in situ-annealed starches were comparable in terms of gelatinisation characteristics to annealed freshly extracted starches where on average, Tp represented 72.7 +/- 10 degrees C and Delta H 20.8 +/- 1.0 J g(-1). Annealing of tubers in situ prior to processing might be beneficial with respect to developing new potato-based products. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available