4.8 Article

Androgen receptor cytosine, adenine, guanine repeats, and haplotypes in relation to ovarian cancer risk

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 13, Pages 5974-5981

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3885

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA054419, R03 CA106079, CA054419-10, CA10607-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biological and epidemiologic evidence suggest that androgen or its receptor may play a role in ovarian cancer pathogenesis The most notable genetic factor influencing androgen receptor (AR) activity is the functional cytosine, adenine, guanine (CAG) repeat in which length is inversely proportional to its transactivational activity. Additional genetic variation due to single nucleotide polymorphisms in the AR gene may be captured through haplotypes. We genotyped the CAG microsatellite and six haplotype-tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (rs962458, rs6152, rs1204038, rs2361634, rs1337080, rs1337082) of the androgen receptor gene in 987 ovarian cancer cases and 1,034 controls from a study conducted in New Hampshire and eastern Massachusetts between May 1992 and July 2003. We estimated haplotype frequencies and calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to evaluate the association between the haplotypes and the AR CAG microsatellite with ovarian cancer risk. We observed that carriage of two alleles with >= 22 CAG repeats was associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer compared with carriage of two alleles with < 22 CAG repeats (covariate-adjusted odds ratios, 1.31; 95% confidence intervals, 1.01-1.69). Five common haplotypes in the AR gene were identified, but no association between these and ovarian cancer risk was observed. Our results suggest that possession of two long AR alleles (>= 22 CAG repeats) may be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer compared with women with two short AR alleles (< 22 CAG repeats).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available