4.6 Article

Changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fitness and genetic diversity during disease progression

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 14, Pages 9006-9018

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.14.9006-9018.2005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [P01 AI057005, R01 AI049170, T32 AI007024, AI25879, AI07024, R56 AI049170, AI49170, AI57005, R21 AI049170, U01 AI025879] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM007250] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the relationship between ex vivo human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) fitness and viral genetic diversity during the course of HIV-1 disease. Primary HIV-1 isolates from 10 patients at different time points were competed against control HIV-1 strains in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cultures to determine relative fitness values. Patient HIV-1 isolates sequentially gained fitness during disease at a significant rate that directly correlated with viral load and HIV-1 env C2V3 diversity. A loss in both fitness and viral diversity was observed upon the initiation of antiretroviral therapy. A possible relationship between genotype and phenotype (virus replication efficiency) is supported by the parallel increases in ex vivo fitness and viral diversity during disease, of which the correlation is largely based on specific V3 sequences. Syncytium-inducing, CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 isolates did have higher relative fitness values than non-syncytium-inducing, CCR5-tropic HIV-1 isolates, as determined by dual virus competitions in PBMC, but increases in fitness during disease were not solely powered by a gradual switch in coreceptor usage. These data provide in vivo evidence that increasing HIV-1 replication efficiency may be related to a concomitant increase in HIV-1 diversity, which in turn may be a determining factor in disease progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available