4.8 Article

Dendritic cells recognize tumor-specific glycosylation of carcinoembryonic antigen on colorectal cancer cells through dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 13, Pages 5935-5944

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4140

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dendritic cells play a pivotal role in the induction of antitumor immune responses. Immature dendritic cells are located intratumorally within colorectal cancer and intimately interact with tumor cells, whereas mature dendritic cells are present peripheral to the tumor. The majority of colorectal cancers overexpress carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and malignant transformation changes the glycosylation of CEA on colon epithelial cells, resulting in higher levels of Lewis' and de novo expression of Lewis(y) on tumor-associated CEA. Dendritic cells express the C-type lectin dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN) that has high affinity for nonsialylated Lewis antigens, so we hypothesized that DC-SIGN is involved in recognition of colorectal cancer cells by dendritic cells. We show that immature dendritic cells within colorectal cancer express DC-SIGN and that immature dendritic cells but not mature dendritic cells interact with tumor cells. DC-SIGN mediates these interactions through binding of Lewis(x) and Lewis(y) carbohydrates on CEA of colorectal cancer cells. In contrast, DC-SIGN does not bind CEA expressed on normal colon epithelium that contains low levels of Lewis antigens. This indicates that dendritic cells may recognize colorectal cancer cells through binding of DC-SIGN to tumor-specific glycosylation on CEA. Similar to pathogens that target DC-SIGN to escape inummosurveillance, tumor cells may interact with DC-SIGN to suppress dendritic cell functions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available