4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Association between interleukin-1 beta (IL-1ß) gene polymorphism and outcome after head injury:: an early report

Journal

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
Volume 147, Issue 7, Pages 715-720

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-005-0529-z

Keywords

head injury; interleukin; interleukin-1 beta; outcome; polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Recent studies focusing on the genetic influences on outcome after head injury (HI) have suggested that different alleles of certain genes are associated with different outcomes. Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) gene, especially beta 2 polymorphism, is frequently observed in Alzheimer's disease, a remarkable degenerative state in which HI is among the known risk factors. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to search for the possible association between the outcome and IL-1 beta gene polymorphism in human HI. Methods. The study group was composed of the 69 patients admitted to the neurosurgery department after HI. The severity of the initial injury was evaluated by means of the Glasgow Coma Scale and outcome six months later was assessed by means of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. IL-1 beta genotypes were determined from blood samples by standard methods. Findings. Fourteen of 25 (56%) patients with IL-1 beta +3953 allele 2 had an unfavourable outcome (dead, vegetative state or severe disability) compared with eight of 44 (18.1%) patients without IL-1 beta 3953 (p = 0.0004). Similarly, 20 of 28 (71.4%) patients with IL-1 beta allele 2 had an unfavourable outcome compared with two of 41 (4.8%) patients without IL-1 beta -511 (p = 0.005). Patients who had a composite of IL-1 beta 2/2 or 1/2 genotype from both -511 and +3953 region of the chromosome 2 were more prone to have bad prognosis. Conclusion. Results of our study demonstrated that there might be a significant association between IL-1 beta gene polymorphism and outcome after HI, supporting the hypothesis of a genetically determined influence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available