4.6 Article

Local overexpression of HB-EGF exacerbates remodeling following myocardial infarction by activating noncardiomyocytes

Journal

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages 862-873

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700282

Keywords

apoptosis; gene transfer; growth factor; myocardial infarction; remodeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insulin-like growth factor ( IGF), hepatocyte growth factor ( HGF), and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor ( HB-EGF) are cardiogenic and cardiohypertrophic growth factors. Although the therapeutic effects of IGF and HGF have been well demonstrated in injured hearts, it is uncertain whether natural upregulation of HB-EGF after myocardial infarction ( MI) plays a beneficial or pathological role in the process of remodeling. To answer this question, we conducted adenoviral HB-EGF gene transduction in in vitro and in vivo injured heart models, allowing us to highlight and explore the HB-EGF-induced phenotypes. Overexpressed HB-EGF had no cytoprotective or additive death-inducible effect on Fas-induced apoptosis or oxidative stress injury in primary cultured mouse cardiomyocytes, although it significantly induced hypertrophy of cardiomyocytes and proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts. Locally overexpressed HB-EGF in the MI border area in rabbit hearts did not improve cardiac function or exhibit an angiogenic effect, and instead exacerbated remodeling at the subacute and chronic stages post-MI. Namely, it elevated the levels of apoptosis, fibrosis, and the accumulation of myofibroblasts and macrophages in the MI area, in addition to inducing left ventricular hypertrophy. Thus, upregulated HB-EGF plays a pathophysiological role in injured hearts in contrast to the therapeutic roles of IGF and HGF. These results imply that regulation of HB- EGF may be a therapeutic target for treating cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available